Showing posts with label names. Show all posts
Showing posts with label names. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 3, 2013

Jane Johnson on the Power of a Name


One interesting aspect of Jane Johnson’s novel, The Secret Country, was how she built upon the power of a person’s name. The ancients believed strongly in the significance of names.  Consider two examples from the Biblical book of Genesis.  When God made a covenant with Abram, he renamed him Abraham.  Later, when his grandson Jacob wins his all-night wrestling match, God renames him Israel, and Jacob/Israel then marks their wrestling-spot with the name Peniel.  All ancient religions, myths, folklore, customs taught the importance of names.  This emphasis stretches beyond the past to infuse contemporary society, and will doubtless prove important in our future. 

As writers are particularly smart people, they recognize this, and thus devote significant time to naming their important places and characters.  But rarely does a name’s power factor significantly in the plot.  In The Secret Country, however, Ben Arnold learns how important names can be.  Remember the talking cat he rescues from Mr. Dodd’s Pet Emporium?  After numerous attempts to prove himself, the cat finally relents and gives him his full name: Ignatius Sorvo Coromandel.  

Illustration by Adam Stower

However, he drives home to Ben the importance of not speaking it flippantly.  And when their paths diverge, the cat –who prefers to be called Iggy—tells him, “I own your true name, Benjamin Christopher Arnold.  I can call you any time.”  The same, of course, applies to the cat.  If Ben calls him by his full name, even if they are many miles apart, the cat will know, and he must hurry to Ben’s aid.  So the cat warns him to use his name cautiously, for he can only summon him three times.

Later, when Ben meets the dragon, he is short on time, and wants to convince it that he has only the best intentions.  So he introduces himself by his full name.  The dragon says, “Well, that’s brave of you, giving your true name to a dragon.  The dragon, who prefers to be called Zark, proves to be easier to convince than Iggy, and tells Ben his full name is Xarkandushak.  While Ben cares for the dragon as best he can, he is still a twelve year old boy, and the importance of names, as well as the magic of Eidolon, is new to him.  Unfortunately, he utters Zark’s full name in Mr. Dodd’s hearing.  Mr. Dodd has gained power in Eidolon by learning the full name of many of its citizens, and has used that power to enslave them, or capture them and sell them in our world.  This lapse gives Mr. Dodd the power to command Zark, and forces Ben to voluntarily submit to his authority for a time, until he can summon others to his aid.  Thus, Ben learns the importance of people’s names.

A recent study discussed in The New Yorker suggests that people may invest more readily in the stocks of companies with simpler, and more easily pronounceable names.  Women with more unisex or masculine-sounding names may climb to higher rungs on the corporate ladder than ones with clearly feminine names.  Voters tend to elect political candidates with simple, easy-to-say names.  But this doesn’t mean that people with more complex or difficult-to-pronounce names cannot succeed.  As the article notes, the name Barack Obama didn’t initially roll off people’s tongues.  But my favorite person’s name comes from Jane Johnson.  At one point, Ben meets a selkie, a person who lives as a seal in water but a Human on land.  She goes by the name Silver, but that is just her nickname, what she prefers to be called.  Her true name is She Who Swims the Silver Path of the Moon, daughter of He Who Hangs Around on the Great South Rock to Attract Females.  I’m sure you’ll agree: that’s one powerful name!

Dragon Dave

Related Internet Links 

Sunday, November 25, 2012

Why God Didn't Give Us Children


If you believe in a Divine Entity, then you believe that He or She holds supernatural power over us mere mortals.  Holy books such as The Bible, as well as myths, fables, and legends, constantly depict omnipotent beings influencing the lives of their creations.  Whether they step in to prevent a war, to endow a person with superhuman strength, or to make a virgin pregnant, the Divine guide our lives, and influence the rise and fall of nations.  While one may take steps to frustrate God's plans, one cannot escape destiny.

My wife and I might have taken certain precautions, at various points in our marriage, to prevent having children.  But if God could open Hannah's barren womb, surely He could have given my wife an appreciation for pickles.  As that glorious event never occurred, I can only assume God didn’t trust us with children.  While we both have our theories, I have to wonder if the chief reason He never blessed us in that way was because He simply didn’t approve of the names we might have given them.

Let’s face it: names have significance.  When Jacob goes twelve rounds with God one night, pummeling the Omnipotent One with the patriarchal equivalent of Body Presses, Bronco Busters, and Clotheslines, he does so because he’s tired of being known as Jacob, the deceiver.  So God relents and gives him a new name, Israel, meaning “one who wrestles with God.”  (He also gives Jacob a limp to remember Him by).  History and myths have given us unforgettable names like Hercules, Jupiter, Caesar, and Lancelot that still resonate with us.  And then there are great names from Fiction that tell us something about a given character.  Consider Simon Templar as The Saint.  Darth Sidious.  Doctor Who.  Rumpole of the Bailey.  Bilbo Baggins.  Sherlock Holmes.  Vlad Taltos.  Stephen King.  Okay, maybe the last one’s real, but they’re all evocative. 

So what’s my point?  Why do I think God disapproved of the names that my wife and I might have chosen for our children?  Well, my wife and I still think that Chocolate would have been a terrific name for our first child.  After all, it’s my wife’s favorite food, and my second-favorite.  Nor are we alone in our feelings, as most everyone likes chocolate.  So not only would we have ample reason to love our child, but the rest of the world would as well.  Strangely, Chocolate remains a rare first name, at least in the United States.  Since most people’s eyes light up when they hear the word, I can only assume its lack of popularity originates with the Divine.  After all, naming a child is just the first step in a never-ending list of parental responsibilities.  So we're left to wonder.  Did we fail before we could begin?  Had we intended on giving our child a more conventional name, such as Ricky or Lucy or Fred or Ethel, might God have then entrusted us with a child? 

We may never learn the answers to such questions, at least as long as we exist in this mortal realm, but somehow, it just doesn’t seem fair.  After all, it’s not like our child couldn’t have gone by a middle name when he or she got older.  In fact, that seems a fairly common practice for people not enamored with their first names.  We even had a few awesome middle names picked out.  Did you realize that over eleven thousand women in the United States are named Cherry?  And what about Chip?  Wouldn't Chip be a great middle name for a guy?

Hey, it’s not like we were going to name our first child Ice Cream.  Now that'd just be silly.

Dragon Dave

Related Internet Links
Learn how rare your name is at www.namestatistics.com